SPECTRE GHOST EMBLEM HOW TO
SPECTRE GHOST EMBLEM CODE

> For example, Ä was an error introduced while trying to record A below a dotted line. Meanwhile, in a parallel universe where ASCII was invented in asia and latin characters were not available until unicode was established: The original character (𡚴) was not added to JIS or Unicode until much later and doesn't display on most sites for me. When reading the copy, the line where the two little pieces of paper met looked like a stroke and was added to the character by mistake. '山 over 女' occurs in the name of a particular place and was thus suitable for inclusion in the JIS standard, but because they couldn't print it as one character yet, 山 and 女 were printed separately, cut out, and pasted onto a sheet of paper, and then copied. > For example, 妛 was an error introduced while trying to record '山 over 女'. Phonetically Korean only has 7 possible codas and other final consonants exist because Korean orthography is a compromise between phoneticism and ideographicism and some words had to be adjusted to show their morphological roots. '갅', for example, comprises of ㄱ g + ㅏ ah + ㄴ n + ㅈ j which is normally pronounced 'gahn' by its own but 'gahn-j' when followed by a vowel (e.g. Pronunciation-wise, multiple consonant clusters in the final position indicate conditional pronunciation. They are real characters people use, my very old personal research indicates that at least a half of them has legitimately appeared in the chat log for example. And that's not enough (KS X 1001 itself was heavily criticized for this), there are multiple secondary character sets got into Unicode Unicode 1.1 had 6,656 arbitrarily ordered characters that were finally replaced by 11,172 neatly ordered characters by 2.0. KS X 1001, the primary character set for Hangul, contains 2,350 out of 11,172 (modern) syllables, which is definitely much larger than 5%.

SPECTRE GHOST EMBLEM HOW TO

> Almost 95% (or even more) of characters have never been used and no one know how to pronounce it. This is probably somewhere online, but I can't find it. What's the history of including a font in Unicode? Why did we stop with the few that are in there? It feels super odd to me to have, say the 'Mathematical Bold Fraktur' range of characters (1D56C - 1D59F ). I'd also love to know the history of the other Latin letter ranges.

Sure, but why? Why was it decided we needed all of the Latin letters in inverted squares, except those? Why aren't they their own symbol? I'm not complaining here, I just want to know the history. The 26 letters are there, but 'A', 'B', 'O', and 'P' are special. The one I've stumbled across recently are the 'Negative Squared Latin Capital Letter' (1F170 - 1F189 ). There are lots of characters in Unicode I'd love to know the history of, but searching for such things is hard, at best. But a reenactment cannot avoid addressing every possibility, and it's going to get most of them wrong. Pronunciation reconstruction is on much firmer ground - and it gets there by not addressing most questions. So I say reenactment of a dead language is an interesting project, but you're inevitably going to make choices that are wildly different from the language as it existed in the past. I say that this categorization question draws upon rules of pronunciation which we don't presently have a good idea of how to describe or characterize at all. But it is a fact about the language, and in principle the question can be answered solely by looking at the pronunciation of sounds within the language - in the ordinary course of events, a Chinese speaker would go their entire life without being exposed to the sound, and yet they would largely agree with each other on what the sound was if they did hear it. To the best of my knowledge, we have no way to answer the question 'how would language X categorize sound Y?' other than experimentation, which is impossible with a dead language. The choice is not arbitrary it is quite consistent across speakers of each language. But something about the phonology of each pushes the sound into one category or the other. The sounds and are both phonemic in both Mandarin and Cantonese. It is perceived by Cantonese speakers as being (as in 'fickle'). For example, English (the sound at the beginning of 'thick') is perceived by Mandarin speakers as being the sound (as in 'sick'). I've been interested for a long time in the question of how we can determine how a language divides up the space of possible sounds. It's not even possible for living languages, although in that case we can draw empiric conclusions. This is already well beyond what's possible for a dead language. It's technically possible for a reader to technically understand what the program is doing

SPECTRE GHOST EMBLEM CODE

Imagine looking at the source code of a game.

Spectre ghost emblem